People v. Santoro
This text of 129 A.D.3d 870 (People v. Santoro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered February 27, 2013, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of driving while ability impaired by drugs.
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel during the proceedings in which he admitted to violating a condition of probation or during the proceedings in which a sentence of imprisonment was imposed upon his underlying conviction (see Strickland v Wash *871 ington, 466 US 668 [1984]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]). The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.3d 870, 9 N.Y.S.3d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-santoro-nyappdiv-2015.