People v. Santiago
109 A.D.3d 1009, 971 N.Y.S.2d 474
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 A.D.3d 1471 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 2013·Published
Opinion
— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a resentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed December 12, 2012, upon remittitur from this Court (see People v Santiago, 97 AD3d 704 [2012], Iv granted 20 NY3d 935 [2012]), on the ground that the resentence was excessive.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, EJ., Angiolillo, Balkin and Hall, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Santiago, 109 A.D.3d 1009, 971 N.Y.S.2d 474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
109 A.D.3d 1009 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Santiago
97 A.D.3d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)