People v. Santiago

87 A.D.3d 1077, 929 N.Y.2d 761
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 20, 2011·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The defendant contends, and the People correctly concede, that contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, his status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing pursuant to the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act, codified in CPL 440.46 (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238 [2011]; People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202, 1202-1203 [2011]). Accordingly, we reverse the order appealed from, and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new determination of the defendant’s motion. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 87 A.D.3d 1077, 929 N.Y.2d 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

87 A.D.3d 1077 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ashton
95 A.D.3d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Cobb
90 A.D.3d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Taylor
89 A.D.3d 1116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Martin
89 A.D.3d 1039 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)