People v. Santiago

66 A.D.2d 598, 886 N.Y.S.2d 803
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 A.D.3d 1172

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered January 19, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was [599]*599not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. Although, in performing weight of evidence review, we may consider the jury’s verdict on other counts (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557, 563 n [2000]), we find that defendant’s acquittal of the gang assault charges does not warrant a different conclusion. Aside from the possibility that it chose to extend leniency, the jury could have reasonably found that, even if gang assault was not proven, defendant unjustifiably and intentionally caused serious physical injury to the victim. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, Catterson, McGuire and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 66 A.D.2d 598, 886 N.Y.S.2d 803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

66 A.D.2d 598 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Rayam
729 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)