People v. Ashton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ashton

95 A.D.3d 1137, 943 N.Y.S.2d 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 95 A.D.3d 1137 (People v. Ashton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ashton, 95 A.D.3d 1137, 943 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), entered June 21, 2010, which denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on September 9, 2004.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.

The defendant correctly contends that, contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, his status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, codified in CPL 440.46 (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 241-242 [2011]; People v Cobb, 90 AD3d 779 [2011]; People v Vidal, 87 AD3d 1085 [2011]; People v Santiago, 87 AD3d 1077 [2011]; People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202, 1202-1203 [2011]). Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46. Mastro, A.P.J., Belen, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 32907(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), entered June 21, 2010, which denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on September 9, 2004.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.

The defendant correctly contends that, contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, his status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, codified in CPL 440.46 (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 241-242 [2011]; People v Cobb, 90 AD3d 779 [2011]; People v Vidal, 87 AD3d 1085 [2011]; People v Santiago, 87 AD3d 1077 [2011]; People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202, 1202-1203 [2011]). Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46. Mastro, A.P.J., Belen, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 32907(U).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.3d 1137, 943 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ashton-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack