People v. Ashton

95 A.D.3d 1137, 943 N.Y.S.2d 895
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J.), entered June 21, 2010, which denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on September 9, 2004.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46.

The defendant correctly contends that, contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, his status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, codified in CPL 440.46 (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 241-242 [2011]; People v Cobb, 90 AD3d 779 [2011]; People v Vidal, 87 AD3d 1085 [2011]; People v Santiago, 87 AD3d 1077 [2011]; People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202, 1202-1203 [2011]). Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46. Mastro, A.P.J., Belen, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2010 NY Slip Op 32907(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ashton, 95 A.D.3d 1137, 943 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

95 A.D.3d 1137 (People v. Ashton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ashby
99 A.D.3d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)