People v. Vidal

87 A.D.3d 1085, 929 N.Y.2d 752
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 20, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 87 A.D.3d 1085 (People v. Vidal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Vidal, 87 A.D.3d 1085, 929 N.Y.2d 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[1086]*1086The Supreme Court denied the defendant’s motion for resentencing solely upon the ground that his status as a reincarcerated parole violator made him ineligible for relief under the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act, which is codified by CPL 440.46. However, “prisoners who have been paroled, and then reincarcerated for violating their parole, are not for that reason barred from seeking relief under the statute” (People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 242 [2011]; see People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202 [2011]; People v Phillips, 82 AD3d 1011, 1012 [2011]).

Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings and a new determination of the defendant’s motion. Skelos, J.P, Eng, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ashton
95 A.D.3d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Cobb
90 A.D.3d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Taylor
89 A.D.3d 1116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Martin
89 A.D.3d 1039 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.3d 1085, 929 N.Y.2d 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vidal-nyappdiv-2011.