People v. Ashby

99 A.D.3d 931, 951 N.Y.2d 911
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 17, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 A.D.3d 931 (People v. Ashby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ashby, 99 A.D.3d 931, 951 N.Y.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The defendant contends, and the People correctly concede, that contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, his status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to apply for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, codified in CPL 440.46 (see People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 241-242 [2011]; People v Ashton, 95 AD3d 1137 [2012]; People v Cobb, 90 AD3d 779 [2011]; People v Rodriguez, 89 AD3d 1042 [2011]; People v Martin, 89 AD3d 1039 [2011]). Accordingly, the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 440.46. Rivera, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Moores
118 A.D.3d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 931, 951 N.Y.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ashby-nyappdiv-2012.