People v. Santiago
82 A.D.3d 479, 918 N.Y.2d 340
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 A.D.3d 703 →
Opinion
[480]*480The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). Defendant claimed the bag he sold to an undercover officer did not contain cocaine but rather “beat” cocaine. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determination rejecting that claim.
We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Catterson, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Santiago, 82 A.D.3d 479, 918 N.Y.2d 340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
82 A.D.3d 479 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)