People v. Santiago

28 A.D.3d 590, 812 N.Y.S.2d 358
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered November 4, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for resentencing.

Based on the information in the predicate felony statement (see CPL 400.21 [2]), the County Court erred in adjudicating the defendant a second felony offender (see People v Stanley, 12 AD3d 467 [2004]). As the People concede, the incarceration dates set forth in the predicate felony statement did not amount [591]*591to a sufficient tolling period to qualify the defendant’s 1987 conviction as a predicate felony under Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (b) (iv) and (v). Accordingly, the sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for resentencing. Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 28 A.D.3d 590, 812 N.Y.S.2d 358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 590 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cassese
58 A.D.3d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)