People v. Santiago

307 A.D.2d 1050, 763 N.Y.S.2d 760
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 277 A.D.2d 258

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered February 25, 2002, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Griffin, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 307 A.D.2d 1050, 763 N.Y.S.2d 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

307 A.D.2d 1050 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)