People v. Santiago

278 A.D.2d 174, 718 N.Y.S.2d 177, 719 N.Y.S.2d 10, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13807
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 63

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered April 1, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Credibility issues, including the discrepancy regarding the color of the ziplock bags of drugs, were properly presented to the jury and there is no reason to disturb its determination. The fact that the jury could not agree on a verdict on the sale count does not warrant a different conclusion (see, People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 278 A.D.2d 174, 718 N.Y.S.2d 177, 719 N.Y.S.2d 10, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 174 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rayam
729 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)