People v. Santiago

282 A.D.2d 479, 722 N.Y.S.2d 414, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3297
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 63

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered February 9, 1998, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The objections by the defendant’s counsel to references to certain hearsay evidence were sustained, and no requests for curative instructions were made. Accordingly, the Supreme Court “must be deemed to have corrected the error to the defendant’s satisfaction” (People v Campbell, 228 AD2d 689, 690).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 282 A.D.2d 479, 722 N.Y.S.2d 414, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 479 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Campbell
228 A.D.2d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)