People v. Santiago

304 A.D.2d 407, 756 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4095
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J., at suppression hearing; Norma Ruiz, J., at plea and sentence), rendered December 13, 2000, convicting defendant of reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing that he had standing to contest the seizure of a pistol from his mother’s bedroom closet since his connection to the apartment in general and to the closet in particular was tenuous, at best (see People v Ortiz, 83 NY2d 840 [1994]; People v Jose, 252 AD2d 401, 403 [1998], affd 94 NY2d 844 [1999]). In any event, we find, based on the totality of circumstances, that defendant’s mother voluntarily consented to the search (People v Hartley, 295 AD2d 159 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 536 [2002]). There is no basis for disturbing the hearing court’s credibility determinations. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 304 A.D.2d 407, 756 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

304 A.D.2d 407 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Perez
37 Misc. 3d 734 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)