People v. Jose

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Jose

724 N.E.2d 366, 94 N.Y.2d 844, 702 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3924

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 16, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 724 N.E.2d 366 (People v. Jose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jose, 724 N.E.2d 366, 94 N.Y.2d 844, 702 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3924 (N.Y. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination whether defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy involved a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s determination of this mixed question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review (see, e.g., People v Ortiz, 83 NY2d 840, 843).

*846 Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI