People v. Santiago

124 A.D.2d 839, 508 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 A.D.2d 857

Opinion

With respect to the challenged alleged errors, we note that the defendant only objected to one comment in the prosecutor’s opening statement. This objection was sustained by the trial court and no further curative relief was requested by the defendant. The other alleged errors were not objected to by the defendant, and in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 124 A.D.2d 839, 508 N.Y.S.2d 986, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

124 A.D.2d 839 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.