People v. Santiago

116 A.D.2d 675, 498 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santiago. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 A.D.2d 857

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Coffinas, J.), all rendered March 5, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree under indictment No. 3374/83, burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 4909/83, attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 6579/83, and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 6634/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santiago, 116 A.D.2d 675, 498 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

116 A.D.2d 675 (People v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)