People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Santiago

116 A.D.2d 675, 498 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51532

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A.D.2d 675 (People v. Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Santiago, 116 A.D.2d 675, 498 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Coffinas, J.), all rendered March 5, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree under indictment No. 3374/83, burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 4909/83, attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 6579/83, and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 6634/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Coffinas, J.), all rendered March 5, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree under indictment No. 3374/83, burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 4909/83, attempted burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 6579/83, and burglary in the second degree under indictment No. 6634/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.D.2d 675, 498 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-santiago-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack