People v. Santana

283 A.D.2d 304, 724 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5385
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santana. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D.2d 641

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered April 4, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Issues of credibility and identification were properly presented to the jury and we find no reason to disturb its determination.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Williams, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santana, 283 A.D.2d 304, 724 N.Y.S.2d 847, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 304 (People v. Santana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)