People v. Santana

254 A.D.2d 201, 679 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11388

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santana. Read the opinion of the Court — 232 A.D.2d 663 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 1998·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered March 1, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 8 years to life and 1 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based entirely on alleged facts outside the record, and thus should be addressed in a CPL 440.10 motion.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing or denial of youthful offender treatment. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is based entirely on alleged facts outside the record, and thus should be addressed in a CPL 440.10 motion.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing or denial of youthful offender treatment. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

People v. Santana, 254 A.D.2d 201, 679 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11388 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

254 A.D.2d 201 (People v. Santana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.