People v. Santana

235 A.D.2d 265, 652 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 295
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.), rendered May 5, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminally negligent homicide, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 to 12 years and H/s to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly seated a venireperson whom defendant had sought to challenge peremptorily. The court’s implicit finding that defendant’s preferred race-neutral explanations were pretextual is supported by the record (see, People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172, 185). Having given both parties ample opportunity to advance their positions, the trial court was entitled promptly to rule on the question of pretext, and defendant failed to raise any objections (see, supra, at 184).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santana, 235 A.D.2d 265, 652 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 265 (People v. Santana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smalls
249 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Richards
245 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)