People v. Santana

271 A.D.2d 275, 706 N.Y.S.2d 634, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4105
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Santana. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D.2d 641

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered June 27, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation remarks are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged comments did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133, lv denied 91 NY2d 976; People v D’Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 NY2d 884). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Santana, 271 A.D.2d 275, 706 N.Y.S.2d 634, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

271 A.D.2d 275 (People v. Santana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. D'Alessandro
184 A.D.2d 114 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Overlee
236 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)