People v. Ruiz

2017 NY Slip Op 9173, 156 A.D.3d 912, 65 N.Y.S.3d 745
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2017·No. 2016-02640·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Melendez, J., at plea; Zaro, J., at sentence), imposed February 23, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 892-893 [2006]; People v Billingslea, 6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Mastro, Miller, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ruiz, 2017 NY Slip Op 9173, 156 A.D.3d 912, 65 N.Y.S.3d 745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 9173 (People v. Ruiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Venture
2018 NY Slip Op 8157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)