People v. Ruiz

2017 NY Slip Op 5985, 153 A.D.3d 562, 56 N.Y.S.3d 874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ruiz. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 A.D.3d 417
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 2, 2017·No. 2015-04657·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant *563 from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mattel, J.), dated May 15, 2015, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. The mitigating factors that the defendant identified either were adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act Guidelines or did not warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Kaff, 149 AD3d 783 [2017]; People v Rose, 146 AD3d 911, 912 [2017]; People v Ibarra, 137 AD3d 1097, 1098 [2016]).

Leventhal, J.R, Hall, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ruiz, 2017 NY Slip Op 5985, 153 A.D.3d 562, 56 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5985 (People v. Ruiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ibarra
137 A.D.3d 1097 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Kaff
2017 NY Slip Op 2684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)