People v. Venture

2018 NY Slip Op 8157
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 28, 2018
Docket2017-11132
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 8157 (People v. Venture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Venture, 2018 NY Slip Op 8157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Venture (2018 NY Slip Op 08157)
People v Venture
2018 NY Slip Op 08157
Decided on November 28, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 28, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-11132

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Justin Venture, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 1604/17)


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Benjamin Welikson of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel; Kristin Rainis on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne J. Melendez, J.), imposed September 7, 2017, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid because the Supreme Court's colloquy conflated the right to appeal with the rights that are automatically forfeited on a plea of guilty (see People v Johnson, _____ AD3d _____, 2018 NY Slip Op 06564 [2d Dept 2018]; People v Valentin, 162 AD3d 693; People v Ruiz, 156 AD3d 912, 913; People v Soto, 155 AD3d 979; People v Ribner, 153 AD3d 1435; see generally People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264). Thus, the waiver does not preclude appellate review of the defendant's claim that his sentence was excessive.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

BALKIN, J.P., SGROI, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ribner
2017 NY Slip Op 6667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Soto
2017 NY Slip Op 8289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Ruiz
2017 NY Slip Op 9173 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Johnson
2018 NY Slip Op 6564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 8157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-venture-nyappdiv-2018.