People v. Ross

286 A.D.2d 512, 729 N.Y.S.2d 635, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8291
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ross. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 A.D.2d 929

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered July 11, 2000, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Ritter, J. P., Altman, McGinity, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ross, 286 A.D.2d 512, 729 N.Y.S.2d 635, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 512 (People v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)