People v. Ross

282 A.D.2d 624, 723 N.Y.S.2d 405, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3839
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ross. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 A.D.2d 929

Opinion

—Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered October 31, 1996, convicting her of attempted forgery in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of probation, and (2) an amended judgment of the [625]*625same court, rendered August 6, 1998, revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed, upon a finding that she had violated a condition thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment.

Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Luciano and H, Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ross, 282 A.D.2d 624, 723 N.Y.S.2d 405, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 624 (People v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)