People v. Ross

276 A.D.2d 649, 714 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10371
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered September 9, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, [650]*650intelligently, and voluntarily waived, without limitation, the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). This valid waiver precludes appellate review of the denial of those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony, physical evidence, and a written statement he gave to law enforcement officers (see, People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831; People v Monk, 270 AD2d 433; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89). Furthermore, since the defendant was informed of the maximum sentence which would be imposed pursuant to the plea agreement, his general waiver of his right to appeal encompasses his claim that the agreed-upon sentence, which was, in fact, imposed, was excessive (see, People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825; People v Brathwaite, supra). Bracken, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ross, 276 A.D.2d 649, 714 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 649 (People v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Anderson
284 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Austin
280 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Espino
279 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)