People v. Rosa

239 A.D.2d 364, 657 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4562
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 5, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 239 A.D.2d 364 (People v. Rosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rosa, 239 A.D.2d 364, 657 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), rendered April 13, 1995, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the court erred in denying his application to withdraw his plea of guilty without first appointing new counsel and holding a hearing is without merit. The decision whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court (see, People v McDowell, 198 AD2d 236). The minutes of the plea proceedings show that the defendant entered a knowing and voluntary Alford plea (see, North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25), and completely refute the claims he made at sentencing. The defendant’s unhappiness with the agreement will not justify withdrawal of the plea (see, People v Leggett, 163 AD2d 862). In the absence of anything in the record to suggest that the defendant’s plea was either improvident or baseless, his assertions of innocence and that he was ill-advised are insufficient to warrant withdrawal of the plea (see, People v Bourdonnay, 160 AD2d 1014).

The defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his right to appeal the judgment of conviction (see, People v Holman, 89 NY2d 876; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Boehm
2004 NY Slip Op 50945(U) (New York Supreme Court, Queens County, 2004)
People v. Fernandez
291 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Hansen
269 A.D.2d 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 A.D.2d 364, 657 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rosa-nyappdiv-1997.