People v. Fernandez
This text of 291 A.D.2d 456 (People v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered March 15, 2000, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The determination of whether to permit the withdrawal of a plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Marzocco, 278 AD2d 515; People v Ochoa, 179 AD2d 689). The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea, since his unsubstantiated claims of innocence and coercion were refuted by his statements during the plea allocution (see, People v Badger, 288 AD2d 485; People v Marzocco, supra; People v DeLeon, 254 AD2d 430; People v Rosa, 239 AD2d 364; People v Lisbon, 187 AD2d 457).
The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit (see, People v Marzocco, supra; People v DeLeon, supra). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, S. Miller, Friedmann and Adams, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 A.D.2d 456, 737 N.Y.S.2d 545, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fernandez-nyappdiv-2002.