People v. Morales

17 A.D.3d 487, 795 N.Y.S.2d 240, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3766
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 11, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 17 A.D.3d 487 (People v. Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Morales, 17 A.D.3d 487, 795 N.Y.S.2d 240, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered July 24, 2003, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea was involuntary is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to move to withdraw his plea on this ground (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636 [1983]; People v Nicholas, 8 AD3d 300 [2004]; People v Alexis, 295 AD2d 529 [2002]). Moreover, to the extent these issues were raised in the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, they are not properly before this Court as he failed to seek leave to appeal from the order denying that motion (see People v Nicholas, supra; People v Alexis, supra; People v Torres, 194 AD2d 815 [1993]). In any event, we find no merit to the defendant’s contentions that he was coerced and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel (see People v Rangolan, 295 AD2d 543 [2002]; People v Fernandez, 291 AD2d 456 [2002]; People v Langhorne, 177 AD2d 713 [1991]). Furthermore, the defendant’s post-plea statements of innocence made to his probation officer did not warrant vacatur of his plea (see People v Dixon, 29 NY2d 55, 57 [1971]; People v Eaton, 14 AD3d 577 [2005]; People v Richardson, 13 AD3d 561 [2004]; People v Figueroa, 146 AD2d 798 [1989]). H. Miller, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Fontanet
126 A.D.3d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Soria
99 A.D.3d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Gibson
95 A.D.3d 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Ingram
80 A.D.3d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Massey
70 A.D.3d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Caufield
57 A.D.3d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Jones
41 A.D.3d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Wynn
40 A.D.3d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Leach
38 A.D.3d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Scoca
38 A.D.3d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Eherts
21 A.D.3d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.D.3d 487, 795 N.Y.S.2d 240, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-morales-nyappdiv-2005.