People v. Romero

197 A.D.2d 493, 604 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10059
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Romero. Read the opinion of the Court — 173 A.D.2d 654

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.), rendered November 26,1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s "no inference” charge as given is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law. Were we to consider the claim, we would affirm as the court’s charge did not draw undue attention to defendant’s decision not to testify (People v Nunez, 182 AD2d 527, lv denied 80 NY2d 836). Concur—Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Romero, 197 A.D.2d 493, 604 N.Y.S.2d 714, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

197 A.D.2d 493 (People v. Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nunez
182 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)