Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Romero

People v. Romero

204 A.D.2d 496, 614 N.Y.S.2d 173
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Romero. Read the opinion of the Court — 173 A.D.2d 654 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.) imposed May 26, 1993.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

[497]*497The defendant’s challenge to the legality of his sentence is patently without merit, since, in this case the imposition of additional jail time for failure to pay a fine or surcharge would not result in a sentence which exceeds the maximum permissible term of imprisonment for the offense to which he pleaded guilty (see, CPL 420.10 [4] [d]).

Appellate review of the remaining issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, O’Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Romero, 204 A.D.2d 496, 614 N.Y.S.2d 173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 496 (People v. Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)