People v. Romano

170 A.D.2d 891, 567 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2426

This text of 170 A.D.2d 891 (People v. Romano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Romano, 170 A.D.2d 891, 567 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Friedlander, J.), rendered April 24, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

[892]*892We have reviewed the record and brief submitted by defense counsel and agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. Consequently, the judgment should be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Judgment affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted. Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich, Jr., Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Creeden
150 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 A.D.2d 891, 567 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-romano-nyappdiv-1991.