Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Romano

People v. Romano

170 A.D.2d 891, 567 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2426
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Romano. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 A.D.2d 595 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 1991·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Friedlander, J.), rendered April 24, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

[892]*892We have reviewed the record and brief submitted by defense counsel and agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. Consequently, the judgment should be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Judgment affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted. Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich, Jr., Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Romano, 170 A.D.2d 891, 567 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

170 A.D.2d 891 (People v. Romano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Creeden
150 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)