People v. Harrison

179 A.D.2d 777

This text of 179 A.D.2d 777 (People v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Harrison, 179 A.D.2d 777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

"The decision of whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered guilty plea rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court” (People v Howard, 138 AD2d 525). The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record reveals that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty in the presence of competent counsel after the court had advised him of the consequences of his plea. The defendant’s protestations at sentencing that he was innocent, and his unsubstantiated claim that he pleaded guilty because he was "afraid”, did not provide a basis for withdrawing his [778]*778plea (see, People v Santana, 176 AD2d 360; People v Latimer, 176 AD2d 350). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Howard
138 A.D.2d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Latimer
176 A.D.2d 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Santana
176 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harrison-nyappdiv-1992.