People v. Restrepo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Restrepo

165 A.D.2d 838

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 17, 1990·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), imposed June 8, 1988.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

A fair reading of the sentence minutes does not support the defendant’s contention that the sentencing court improperly took into consideration a charge of which the defendant had been acquitted in imposing sentence (cf., People v Villanueva, 144 AD2d 285; People v Coward, 100 AD2d 628). Moreover, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), imposed June 8, 1988.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

A fair reading of the sentence minutes does not support the defendant’s contention that the sentencing court improperly took into consideration a charge of which the defendant had been acquitted in imposing sentence (cf., People v Villanueva, 144 AD2d 285; People v Coward, 100 AD2d 628). Moreover, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.

People v. Restrepo, 165 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

165 A.D.2d 838 (People v. Restrepo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related