People v. Chin
This text of 255 A.D.2d 393 (People v. Chin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), rendered June 13, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in precluding the defendant’s introduction of a witness’s alleged prior inconsistent statement (see, People v Duncan, 46 NY2d 74, 80-81, cert denied 442 US 910).
The court did not err in failing to conduct an inquiry of a juror who, after shaking her head sideways, answered affirmatively that the verdict was hers (see, People v Maddox, 139 AD2d 597, 598; see also, People v Hayes, 222 AD2d 292).
[394]*394The sentence imposed was not harsh or excessive (see, People v Storelli, 216 AD2d 891; People v Restrepo, 165 AD2d 838; see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D.2d 393, 679 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-chin-nyappdiv-1998.