People v. Ray

272 A.D.2d 203, 708 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5625
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered December 7, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that expert testimony by a detective invaded the jury’s exclusive province of determining an ultimate issue of fact in the case is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion in permitting limited background testimony on relevant aspects of the methodology of street-level drug sales and [204]*204that the officer did not express an opinion on the ultimate issue of defendant’s intent to sell. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ray, 272 A.D.2d 203, 708 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

272 A.D.2d 203 (People v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Quarless
123 A.D.3d 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Ingram
2 A.D.3d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Hicks
301 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)