People v. Quarless

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Quarless

123 A.D.3d 1056, 997 N.Y.S.2d 320

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 2014

Docket2013-00586

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.3d 1056 (People v. Quarless) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Quarless, 123 A.D.3d 1056, 997 N.Y.S.2d 320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), rendered November 26, 2013, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated the conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of burglary in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]; cf. People v Sedita, 113 AD3d 638 [2014]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), rendered November 26, 2013, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated the conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of burglary in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]; cf. People v Sedita, 113 AD3d 638 [2014]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.3d 1056, 997 N.Y.S.2d 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-quarless-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack