People v. Ray

245 A.D.2d 469, 666 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14126
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ray. Read the opinion of the Court — 273 A.D.2d 611

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Berry, J.), rendered September 24, 1996, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that [470]*470he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Thus, he has no basis to now complain that the sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). In any event, we have reviewed the sentence and find that it is not excessive. Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ray, 245 A.D.2d 469, 666 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 469 (People v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)