People v. Randall
225 A.D.2d 480, 639 N.Y.2d 919, 639 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3161
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 26, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Defendant’s claim that his guilty plea was coerced by his attorney is belied by the minutes of the. plea proceeding and plea withdrawal hearing, which show that the plea represented a voluntary and intelligent choice among alternative courses of action, including exposure to a harsher sentence after trial or even after further plea negotiations (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 19-20). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Randall, 225 A.D.2d 480, 639 N.Y.2d 919, 639 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 480 (People v. Randall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Arroyo
245 A.D.2d 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Fredericks
235 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)