Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Randall

People v. Randall

225 A.D.2d 480, 639 N.Y.2d 919, 639 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3161
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 26, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 480 (People v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Randall, 225 A.D.2d 480, 639 N.Y.2d 919, 639 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Defendant’s claim that his guilty plea was coerced by his attorney is belied by the minutes of the. plea proceeding and plea withdrawal hearing, which show that the plea represented a voluntary and intelligent choice among alternative courses of action, including exposure to a harsher sentence after trial or even after further plea negotiations (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 19-20). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Arroyo
245 A.D.2d 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Fredericks
235 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 480, 639 N.Y.2d 919, 639 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-randall-nyappdiv-1996.