People v. Randall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Randall

202 A.D.2d 450, 609 N.Y.S.2d 852

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Randall. Read the opinion of the Court — 177 A.D.2d 661 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered July 15, 1993, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[451]*451We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered July 15, 1993, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[451]*451We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

People v. Randall, 202 A.D.2d 450, 609 N.Y.S.2d 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

202 A.D.2d 450 (People v. Randall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related