People v. Ramos

128 A.D.3d 545, 8 N.Y.S.3d 562
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ramos. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 A.D.3d 684
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 2015·No. 966/11 15167A 4583/12 15167·Published

Opinion

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered on or about March 5, 2013, and an order, same court and Justice, entered March 5, 2013, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due delibera *546 tion having been had thereon, and finding the sentences not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment and order so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ramos, 128 A.D.3d 545, 8 N.Y.S.3d 562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

128 A.D.3d 545 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.