People v. Ramos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ramos

113 A.D.3d 543, 979 N.Y.2d 515

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 2014

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 A.D.3d 543 (People v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ramos, 113 A.D.3d 543, 979 N.Y.2d 515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Defendant was identified by three witnesses, each of whom knew defendant from prior occasions.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Gische and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Defendant was identified by three witnesses, each of whom knew defendant from prior occasions.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Gische and Clark, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A.D.3d 543, 979 N.Y.2d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ramos-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack