People v. Mena
This text of 87 A.D.3d 946 (People v. Mena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the suppression hearing, the police officers testified that during a lawful car stop, they detected the odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle; moreover, the codefendant admitted to police officers that he and defendant had been smoking marijuana earlier in the day in the car on the way to New York from Atlantic City. Accordingly, the police clearly had probable cause to search the vehicle under the automobile exception, and this included a search of the trunk (see United States v Ross, 456 US 798, 825 [1982]; People v Langen, 60 NY2d 170, 180-182 [1983], cert denied 465 US 1028 [1984]; People v Hughes, 68 [947]*947AD3d 894 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 841 [2010]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Catterson, Renwick, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 A.D.3d 946, 930 N.Y.2d 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mena-nyappdiv-2011.