People v. Ramos
113 A.D.3d 543, 979 N.Y.2d 515
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 28, 2014·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Defendant was identified by three witnesses, each of whom knew defendant from prior occasions.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Gische and Clark, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Ramos, 113 A.D.3d 543, 979 N.Y.2d 515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 543 (People v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Huling
140 A.D.3d 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)