People v. Rabideau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rabideau

190 A.D.2d 1096

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1993·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By entering a guilty plea, defendant forfeited his right to contend on appeal that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (see, People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940, 942; see also, People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845, 847).

We have examined defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Finnerty, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Balio, Doerr, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By entering a guilty plea, defendant forfeited his right to contend on appeal that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (see, People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940, 942; see also, People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845, 847).

We have examined defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Finnerty, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Balio, Doerr, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Rabideau, 190 A.D.2d 1096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

190 A.D.2d 1096 (People v. Rabideau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related