People v. Suarez

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Suarez

434 N.E.2d 245, 55 N.Y.2d 940, 449 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3125

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 11, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by49 cases

This text of 434 N.E.2d 245 (People v. Suarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Suarez, 434 N.E.2d 245, 55 N.Y.2d 940, 449 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3125 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

[942]*942OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that his rights under CPL 30.30 were violated was forfeited when he entered his plea of guilty (People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845). In addition, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, we find there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial (see People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442).

Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum; Chief Judge Cooke and Judge Jones taking no part.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI