People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky

296 A.D.2d 431, 745 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7029
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 296 A.D.2d 431 (People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky, 296 A.D.2d 431, 745 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated April 20, 2001, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that his right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 was violated (see People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940; People ex rel. Deuel v Campbell, 188 AD2d 754). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Ritter v. Warden, Kings County Hospital Prison Ward
13 A.D.3d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 A.D.2d 431, 745 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-jairam-v-bednowsky-nyappdiv-2002.