People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky
This text of 296 A.D.2d 431 (People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated April 20, 2001, which denied the petition.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that his right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 was violated (see People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940; People ex rel. Deuel v Campbell, 188 AD2d 754). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 A.D.2d 431, 745 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-jairam-v-bednowsky-nyappdiv-2002.