People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky

296 A.D.2d 431, 745 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7029

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated April 20, 2001, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that his right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 was violated (see People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940; People ex rel. Deuel v Campbell, 188 AD2d 754). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated April 20, 2001, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that his right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 was violated (see People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940; People ex rel. Deuel v Campbell, 188 AD2d 754). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky, 296 A.D.2d 431, 745 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

296 A.D.2d 431 (People ex rel. Jairam v. Bednowsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related